Date: Wed, 8 Dec 1999 00:07:46 -0500 From: "Charles Anderson" <caa@columbus.rr.com> To: Seigo Tanimura <tanimura@r.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp> Cc: schuerge@wjpserver.CS.Uni-SB.DE, fn@radio-do.de, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: AWE64 problems Message-ID: <19991208000746.A1622@midgard.dhs.org> In-Reply-To: <14413.49878.644230.10865D@rina.r.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp>; from Seigo Tanimura on Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 11:30:46AM %2B0900 References: <19991207222414.A555@radio-do.de> <199912072200.XAA14065@wjpserver.cs.uni-sb.de> <14413.49878.644230.10865D@rina.r.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I looked for some meaning to the -100, is this documented somewhere? Who calls it? -Charlie On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 11:30:46AM +0900, Seigo Tanimura wrote: > On Tue, 7 Dec 1999 23:00:02 +0100 (MET), > Thomas Schuerger <schuerge@wjpserver.CS.Uni-SB.DE> said: > > >> --- sbc.c.orig Mon Dec 6 19:26:31 1999 > >> +++ sbc.c Tue Dec 7 22:15:25 1999 > >> @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ > >> if (error) > >> return error; > >> else > >> - return -100; > >> + return -1; > >> } > >> > >> static int > > Thomas> Works fine for me. Thanks!!! > > > Yes, this patch should work. The probe likelyhood(do we call it so?) for > unknown device is -100, so it does not make sense for sbc to return > -100. > > -1 might be too high, -50 sounds good to me. > > -- > Seigo Tanimura <tanimura@r.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp> <tanimura@freebsd.org> > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message -- Charles Anderson caa@columbus.rr.com No quote, no nothin' To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19991208000746.A1622>