Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:44:52 -0300 From: Gonzalo Nemmi <gnemmi@gmail.com> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: WITHOUT_MODULES, does it actually work? Message-ID: <19e9a5dc0911171944q5d15dc96t83ecd53befb07621@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <BB106D32-DF64-4086-801F-286050314200@wanderview.com> References: <200911172021.16848.gnemmi@gmail.com> <41D86F39-D98A-4195-8345-765E0F742FAE@wanderview.com> <19e9a5dc0911171614l42f4c90ci2abce9982727ef61@mail.gmail.com> <4B033E22.3060700@FreeBSD.org> <8727F2A4-B830-43EE-BB9B-A17798374C00@wanderview.com> <4B034899.9090408@FreeBSD.org> <BB106D32-DF64-4086-801F-286050314200@wanderview.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:59 PM, Ben Kelly <ben@wanderview.com> wrote:
>
> On Nov 17, 2009, at 8:06 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
>
> > Ben Kelly wrote:
> >> It seems there are some left over bits then. I have this in
> /usr/src/sys/modules/Makefile:
> >>
> >> .for reject in ${WITHOUT_MODULES}
> >> SUBDIR:= ${SUBDIR:N${reject}}
> >> .endfor
> >
> > Well it seems my search was not exhaustive.
> >
> > My recommendation then would be to file a src PR so that someone can
> > look into it. :)
>
> I've opened a doc PR for the bad example in the handbook and a conf PR for
> the patch to make WITHOUT_MODULES work from the kernel config file using
> makeoptions. I haven't gotten PR numbers back from the system yet.
>
> - Ben_______________________________________________
So, basically .. not only man make.conf and the handbook examples are wrong
.. WITHOUT_MODULES doesn't actually work :s
Thanks a lot for your research, testing, PR and patches Ben !
Please, should you be able to, I would like to know the PR number so I can
follow it.
Hope your patch makes it in and WITHOUT_MODULES works as expected :)
Best Regards
Gonzalo Nemmi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19e9a5dc0911171944q5d15dc96t83ecd53befb07621>