Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2011 08:16:40 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> Cc: FreeBSD-Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: possible mountroot regression Message-ID: <1A828073-1D5F-4850-9379-4AB62CF3DAE3@xcllnt.net> In-Reply-To: <4E580B14.7090208@FreeBSD.org> References: <4E580B14.7090208@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Aug 26, 2011, at 2:07 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>=20
> It seems that after the introduction of the mountroot scripting =
language a user
> now has exactly one chance to try to specify a correct root device at =
the
> mountroot prompt. I am not sure that that is convenient/enough.
This is no different from before.
> I suspect that the following code is the cause:
>=20
> static void
> vfs_mountroot_conf0(struct sbuf *sb)
> {
> char *s, *tok, *mnt, *opt;
> int error;
>=20
> sbuf_printf(sb, ".onfail panic\n");
> =85
Yes.
It is certainly a behavior we can improve upon. It's
rather annoying to get a panic on a typo. However,
we must remain cognizant of the fact that an immediate
hard failure is what's needed at times.
Maybe a good approach is to change to ".onfail retry"
and extend the root mount prompt with a reboot command,
so that the user/operator is does not have to worry
about typos *and* don't have to trigger a panic just
so that he/she can initiate a reboot.
Thoughts?
--=20
Marcel Moolenaar
marcel@xcllnt.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1A828073-1D5F-4850-9379-4AB62CF3DAE3>