Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:45:04 -0700 From: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> Cc: marius@freebsd.org, gallatin@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org, np@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NICs not in GENERIC Message-ID: <1DA65887-49B6-446D-AC31-67B149A6C736@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <20120221155656.Horde.kkqxT5jmRSRPQ7C4wSPK1kA@webmail.leidinger.net> References: <20120221155656.Horde.kkqxT5jmRSRPQ7C4wSPK1kA@webmail.leidinger.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Feb 21, 2012, at 7:56 AM, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Hi, >=20 > is there a specific reason that the following NICs are not (or shall = not be) in GENERIC (at least on i386)? > - if_cas: is compiled as a module, Sun hardware, non-x86 only? > - if_gem: is compiled as a module, Apple/Sun, non-x86 only? > - if_hme: is compiled as a module, Sun hardware, non-x86 only? If these aren't for i386 hardware, then why would they need to be in the = i386 GENERIC profile? Scott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1DA65887-49B6-446D-AC31-67B149A6C736>