Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 13:32:22 EDT From: TM4525@aol.com To: micheal@tsgincorporated.com Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Serious investigations into UNIX and Windows Message-ID: <1a5.29af5401.2eafe426@aol.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In a message dated 10/26/04 12:24:06 PM Eastern Daylight Time, micheal@tsgincorporated.com writes: > If you think that administering a Windows server is so simple then > answer the following test: > > How do you lock down an Exchange 5.5 server to prevent a spammer from > using it as a relay. > So who was the one who said either was "easy"? I said it takes a higher talent level to generally administer a un*x box than a windows box. I don't think that just because you can think of something thats not easy to do in windows makes any point at all. The fact that a un*x guy had to be called in to solve the problem says alot about the type of talent that is required to do most things that windows techs do.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1a5.29af5401.2eafe426>