Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 14:57:43 EST From: TM4526@aol.com To: thad.butterworth@hp.com Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: difference between releases Message-ID: <1d6.2f657330.2ec129b7@aol.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In a message dated 11/8/04 2:41:38 PM Eastern Standard Time, thad.butterworth@hp.com writes: >As far as open-open source being the only one in beta, I work in >development where our code is closed-source. Even we have to admit that >our releases fit better into the category of BETA than RELEASE. Which is pretty-much why I haven't bought or recommended anything from HP since the LaserJet Plus. I wonder how they feel about you revealing that? Please lets not get into "yet-another" open-source discussion. My only point was that a "Release" should not be "just another snapshot", there should be some "plan". If the 4 bozos who jump on everything I say will just cut back on the coffee there wouldn't be so much BS.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1d6.2f657330.2ec129b7>