Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2000 14:03:44 +0100 (CET) From: Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de> To: chuckr@picnic.mat.net Cc: Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com>, Shigeyuki Fukushima <shige@FreeBSD.ORG>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bzip2 in src tree (Was Re: ports/16252: bsd.port.mk: Add bzip2 support for distribution patches) Message-ID: <200001231303.OAA75362@saturn.kn-bremen.de> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0001221238240.59825-100000@picnic.mat.net> References: <20000122123109.E59732@shadow.blackdawn.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <Pine.BSF.4.21.0001221238240.59825-100000@picnic.mat.net> you write: >... >A case would have to be built that bzip2 does something critical that >cannot be done without bzip2. Else, it stays as a fine port. Heck, emacs >is a fine port too, but it'll never get into the base system. Very true, but i can actually think of one thing were bzip2 would really be useful: to better compress the kernel on install floppies so you could keep more things in it. (like ptys and pass which would make fixit more useful, or pppoe which was thrown out too recently if i'm not mistaken.) Btw you could probably also kgzip the loader, that would free up some space too. Regards, -- Juergen Lock <nox.foo@jelal.kn-bremen.de> (remove dot foo from address to reply) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200001231303.OAA75362>