Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 28 Jan 2000 17:37:00 -0800
From:      "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org>
To:        "Louis A. Mamakos" <louie@TransSys.COM>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: new C++ compiler changes
Message-ID:  <20000128173700.A24289@dragon.nuxi.com>
In-Reply-To: <200001290007.TAA05379@whizzo.transsys.com>; from louie@TransSys.COM on Fri, Jan 28, 2000 at 07:07:39PM -0500
References:  <200001290007.TAA05379@whizzo.transsys.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jan 28, 2000 at 07:07:39PM -0500, Louis A. Mamakos wrote:
> Is it possible to bump the revision of libstdc++ (and perhaps others) so
> that existing programs can continue to function?

Nope.  This is -CURRENT and this type of thing happens.  And with a
RELEASE about to happen, I don't want people continually asking for these
old libs.

Right now I can easily diagnose the problem and determine which libs are
-fno-vtable-thunks and which are -fvtable-thunks.

> I fear I will be tracking down occasional broken C++ programs for days
> now.

I'd rather people flushed out the old libs now, than have them haunt us
in weird ways for months.
 
-- 
-- David    (obrien@NUXI.com)


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000128173700.A24289>