Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 03:19:31 -0800 From: David Holloway <davidhol@windriver.com> To: Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: BSD VS BDS Message-ID: <200003301119.DAA14184@papermill.wrs.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 30 Mar 2000 12:16:44 %2B0200." <20000330121644.B1022@cons.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Oh I completely disagree. Many serious orgnanizations and people concerned with stability work with 3.x and plan on sticking with 3.x until many of the serious changes to 4.0 have proven themselves. The gcc (2.9.x -- 3.x) compiler for example, has only just recently become as rock solid as the standard gcc 2.7.2.3 for freebsd 3.x In message <20000330121644.B1022@cons.org>, Martin Cracauer writes: >In <81876428.13.1636@mx1-12.onmedia.com>, p_a_r wrote: >> Ok but i downloaded the 3.3-stable is there some problems whit that >> and whats so good in the new 4.0?? > >Oh no, not again. 3.3 is not "bad", but I would recommend updating to >4.0/4.1 instead of 3.4/3.5 when the time comes. Higher 3.x releases - >in my opinion - suffer a little from not enough testing when teh >developers were already approching 4.0. > >Martin >-- >%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% >Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org> http://www.cons.org/cracauer/ > Tel.: (private) +4940 5221829 Fax.: (private) +4940 5228536 > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200003301119.DAA14184>