Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 24 Apr 2000 14:14:50 -0700 (PDT)
From:      "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
To:        billf@chc-chimes.com (Bill Fumerola)
Cc:        rkw@dataplex.net (Richard Wackerbarth), current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: SMP changes and breaking kld object module compatibility
Message-ID:  <200004242114.OAA11696@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
In-Reply-To: <20000424150734.Y397@jade.chc-chimes.com> from Bill Fumerola at "Apr 24, 2000 03:07:35 pm"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2000 at 02:02:28PM -0500, Richard Wackerbarth wrote:
> 
> > That is also partly why you are also lacking the respect and support of a 
> > wider audience. If you act like FreeBSD is just a "developer's sandbox", 
> > that's what it will be. If you want it to be something greater than that, you
> > must consider what you are doing to third party developers and end users.
> 
> Developers and early adopters are the ones tracking -STABLE. Users are
> installing binary snapshots and releases.

Some users do install snapshots and/or releases.  Snap shots occur on a
regular basis and are affected by this change in API.

> No-one in their right mind would release a module for "4.0-STABLE sometime
> between april and may". They release for 4.0-RELEASE or 4.1-RELEASE,
> this would not cause problems for those people.

Ahh.. the problem occurs with user Z running snap 4.0-stable 4/30 when trying
to use vendor X module for 4.0-release.  Get it??

-- 
Rod Grimes - KD7CAX @ CN85sl - (RWG25)               rgrimes@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200004242114.OAA11696>