Date: Fri, 05 May 2000 20:48:40 +0900 From: SADA Kenji <sada@bsdclub.org> To: knu@idaemons.org Cc: sada@FreeBSD.org, obrien@FreeBSD.org, tom@eborcom.com, girgen@partitur.se, cjh@kr.freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Introducing a netscape wrapper Message-ID: <20000505204840K.sada@bsdclub.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 05 May 2000 19:06:31 %2B0900". <86u2gdmhug.wl@localhost.local.idaemons.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <86u2gdmhug.wl@localhost.local.idaemons.org> knu@idaemons.org writes: >> Everytime you find something in common with all the netscape ports' >> wrappers, you can move it to the new wrapper, one by one. That's what >> I call "minimum changes". I understand it. But I don't understand why the new wrapper should be an independent port. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000505204840K.sada>