Date: Sun, 07 May 2000 00:13:37 +0900 From: Shigeyuki Fukushima <shige@FreeBSD.org> To: kris@FreeBSD.org Cc: asami@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/Mk bsd.emacs.mk bsd.port.mk Message-ID: <20000506151430344.NOEJ.904.t-mta2.odn.ne.jp@mta2.odn.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0005060532430.69390-100000@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <200005061045.DAA61204@freefall.freebsd.org> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0005060532430.69390-100000@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/Mk bsd.emacs.mk bsd.port.mk
Date: Sat, 6 May 2000 05:33:56 -0700 (PDT)
Hi.
kris> Should this be named bsd.ports.emacs.mk for consistency?
After argument at ports-jp ML, "ports" (or "port") string is redundant.
Because this file is in ${PORTSDIR}/Mk.
In this sense, I think that ${PORTSDIR}/Mk/bsd.port.mk should be
renamed to a proper filename. :)
--- shige (Shigeyuki Fukushima) <shige@FreeBSD.ORG>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000506151430344.NOEJ.904.t-mta2.odn.ne.jp>