Date: Sat, 13 May 2000 22:28:25 +0200 From: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <jruigrok@via-net-works.nl> To: Manfred Antar <mantar@pacbell.net> Cc: Assar Westerlund <assar@sics.se>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: MAKEDEV Warning ??? Message-ID: <20000513222825.B32232@lucifer.bart.nl> In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.3.2.20000513130322.00b34a48@pozo.com>; from mantar@pacbell.net on Sat, May 13, 2000 at 01:07:00PM -0700 References: <Jeroen <4.3.2.3.2.20000513115532.00b32ee8@pozo.com> <20000513210731.C31594@lucifer.bart.nl> <5lwvkyz0n0.fsf@assaris.sics.se> <4.3.2.3.2.20000513130322.00b34a48@pozo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-On [20000513 22:08], Manfred Antar (mantar@pacbell.net) wrote: >Which is the correct dev /dev/da0a , /dev/rda0a , or /dev/da0s1a to use >rda0a won't work. da0a works fine and I got rid of all the da0s1a,b,e,f,g ones ? The /dev/da0s1a would be the correct one to use, example: # Device Mountpoint FStype Options Dump Pass# /dev/da0s1b none swap sw 0 0 /dev/da0s1a / ufs rw 1 1 /dev/da0s1e /tmp ufs rw 2 2 /dev/da0s1g /usr ufs rw 2 2 /dev/da0s1f /var ufs rw 2 2 /dev/da0s1h /work ufs rw 2 2 /dev/cd0c /cdrom cd9660 ro,noauto 0 0 proc /proc procfs rw 0 0 /dev/fd0 /diskette msdos rw,noauto 0 0 -- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven Network- and systemadministrator <jruigrok@via-net-works.nl> VIA Net.Works The Netherlands BSD: Technical excellence at its best http://www.via-net-works.nl I walk, I walk alone, into the promised land... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000513222825.B32232>