Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 12:15:39 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: cjclark@home.com Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: The procfs Hole in 2.2.8-STABLE? Message-ID: <200005221815.MAA96713@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 22 May 2000 14:02:32 EDT." <20000522140231.A35505@cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com> References: <20000522140231.A35505@cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com> <20000521140847.G96573@cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com> <200005220437.WAA92094@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20000522140231.A35505@cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com> "Crist J. Clark" writes: : Should I be concerned about these "many vulnerabilities?" Where are : they documented? We stopped committing to make backports to 2.x when FreeBSD 3.2 was released, or about this time last year. Anything that happened after that may or may not hav emade it back to 2.2.8. Also, some of them weren't noteworthy at the time, so no advisory was issued (I had the advisory setting too high). Some exploits have surfaced against old versions of FreeBSD. There's no central collection of these documented anywhere. I wish I had a better answer for you than this. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200005221815.MAA96713>