Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 20:25:17 +0200 From: Alexander Langer <alex@big.endian.de> To: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Ade Lovett <ade@FreeBSD.ORG>, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: patches/ handling Message-ID: <20000607202517.D15229@cichlids.cichlids.com> In-Reply-To: <20000607091405.A55268@dragon.nuxi.com>; from obrien@FreeBSD.ORG on Wed, Jun 07, 2000 at 09:14:05AM -0700 References: <20000605184259.A21736@cichlids.cichlids.com> <20000606210209.B20037@dragon.nuxi.com> <20000607090533.D44242@FreeBSD.org> <20000607091405.A55268@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thus spake David O'Brien (obrien@FreeBSD.ORG): > I VERY much agree with you. I believe the separate arch patch path will > be a maintenance nightmare. I completely disagree. Read bsd.port.mk please. The archpatch-directory already exist, I only change its behaviour to make it (more) useful. Alex -- This is a FreeBSD advocacy ~/.sig. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000607202517.D15229>