Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2000 18:37:36 +0200 From: "R.I.Pienaar" <rip@pinetec.co.za> To: Tom Samplonius <tom@sdf.com> Cc: Gabriel Ambuehl <gabriel_ambuehl@buz.ch>, Jason Fesler <jfesler@gigo.com>, Luigi Rizzo <luigi@info.iet.unipi.it>, Chris Shenton <cshenton@uucom.com>, Alan Batie <batie@rdrop.com>, isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: load balancing Message-ID: <20000708183736.A16123@pinetec.co.za> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.10007080855540.5054-100000@misery.sdf.com>; from tom@sdf.com on Sat, Jul 08, 2000 at 08:58:17AM -0700 References: <20000708112606.G10253@pinetec.co.za> <Pine.BSF.4.05.10007080855540.5054-100000@misery.sdf.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat Jul 08, 2000 at 08:58:17AM -0700, Tom Samplonius wrote: > > Foundry Networks makes a load-balancer box that is able to keep itself > synced with another unit for both fail-over and load-balancing. The unit > balances requests to whatever backend servers you have, and if one of the > backend servers croaks, the Foundry unit stops sending requests to it. > This solution give you complete backend and frontend redunancy. how does it monitor the boxes behind the load blanacer, when does it find out that your box died and its ment to failover? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000708183736.A16123>