Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2000 23:24:22 +0200 From: Neil Blakey-Milner <nbm@mithrandr.moria.org> To: "Lawrence N. King " <missnglnk@sneakerz.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: -ssl Ports Message-ID: <20000823232421.A16053@mithrandr.moria.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0008231558540.15857-100000@sneakerz.org>; from missnglnk@sneakerz.org on Wed, Aug 23, 2000 at 04:01:40PM -0500 References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0008231558540.15857-100000@sneakerz.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed 2000-08-23 (16:01), Lawrence N. King wrote: > Should new/current -ssl ports be integrated with their existing > counterparts or should they remain separate? I'd propose doing master ports like vim5 and vim-lite, and w3m and w3m-ssl. w3m/w3m-ssl is a good example. Neil -- Neil Blakey-Milner Sunesi Clinical Systems nbm@mithrandr.moria.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000823232421.A16053>