Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2000 17:56:39 -0400 From: Bill Fumerola <billf@chimesnet.com> To: Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami <asami@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu>, FreeBSD Ports <ports@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Ports Options Paper Message-ID: <20000910175639.F47559@jade.chc-chimes.com> In-Reply-To: <200009082243.e88Mh9V05579@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>; from asami@FreeBSD.org on Fri, Sep 08, 2000 at 03:43:09PM -0700 References: <20000903052226.E1205@radon.gryphonsoft.com> <200009082243.e88Mh9V05579@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Sep 08, 2000 at 03:43:09PM -0700, Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami wrote:
> "One package per port" is the First Principle of the Ports Collection
> for a good reason. :)
We either need to reconsider that, or something like:
ports/mail/postfix+sasl
ports/mail/postfix+mysql
ports/mail/postfix+ldap
ports/mail/postfix+mysql+ldap
ports/mail/postfix+mysql+sasl
ports/mail/postfix+ldap+sasl
ports/mail/postfix+mysql+ldap+sasl
Is going to have to happen. Ugh.
--
Bill Fumerola - Network Architect, BOFH / Chimes, Inc.
billf@chimesnet.com / billf@FreeBSD.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000910175639.F47559>