Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 04:53:47 -0500 From: Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Cc: Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports/21380: portlint is stupid. Message-ID: <20000919045347.T35550@radon.gryphonsoft.com> In-Reply-To: <xzpsnqwsvag.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>; from des@ofug.org on Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 09:19:51AM %2B0200 References: <200009190030.RAA79490@freefall.freebsd.org> <20000918234052.O35550@radon.gryphonsoft.com> <xzpsnqwsvag.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 09:19:51AM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > The -v option also drops lots of other tests. Got a better way to do this? I don't want to add a lot of extra options to specify which tests should be built and which shouldn't. That would just be butt-ugly. -- Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu> <will@FreeBSD.org> GCS/E/S @d- s+:+ a--- C++ UB++++$ P+ L- E--- W+ N-- !o ?K w--- O- M+ V- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X+ R+ tv+ b++ DI+++ D+ G++ e>++++ h! r- y? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000919045347.T35550>