Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 19:52:43 +0100 From: j mckitrick <jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org> To: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> Cc: chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: new license idea? Message-ID: <20000919195242.B72836@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20000919124101.05089eb0@localhost>; from brett@lariat.org on Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 12:46:46PM -0600 References: <4.3.2.7.2.20000919104443.00bf44b0@localhost> <20000919160157.A70731@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <4.3.2.7.2.20000919104443.00bf44b0@localhost> <20000919175403.B71735@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <4.3.2.7.2.20000919124101.05089eb0@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
| Fragmentation/forking can be as much a sign of creativity and progress as | a problem. It is only problematic when it is used by a large company | (e.g. Microsoft) as a bludgeon. Or when it breaks compatibility and | there's not appropriate backward compatibility. I understand that there are 2 forks in windows development, but how are they used to bludgeon, since they are targeted at 2 different audiences? jcm -- "I drank WHAT ?!" - Socrates To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000919195242.B72836>