Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 20 Sep 2000 00:54:47 -0700
From:      "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG>
To:        Max Khon <fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru>
Cc:        Randell Jesup <rjesup@wgate.com>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, Bruce Bauman <bbauman@wgate.com>
Subject:   Re: GDB 4.18 and shared libraries (Mozilla)
Message-ID:  <20000920005447.B97385@dragon.nuxi.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0009201229450.13341-100000@iclub.nsu.ru>; from fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru on Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 01:15:16PM %2B0700
References:  <20000919103436.B94601@dragon.nuxi.com> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0009201229450.13341-100000@iclub.nsu.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 01:15:16PM +0700, Max Khon wrote:
> do you plan to MFC GDB 5.0? 

It hasn't been completely finished updating in -CURRENT.  Of course if
someone wants to maintain GDB in src/contrib/gdb they are *very* welcome
to do so.  I never desired to become the GDB maintainer.

> if yes, when we can expect it to appear in -stable? 

Several weeks after it is done in -CURRENT.


> will you upgrade binutils as well?

Huh??  Both -STABLE and -CURRENT are using the latest Binutils release.


> PR/20373 definitely is not a GDB problem.

And it is not a FreeBSD problem.  It is a Binutils problem.


> > Thus the lack of the rev 1.8-1.9 change is a GDB/Binutils problem, not a
> > FreeBSD one.
> 
> this IS a FreeBSD problem.

Well *_I_* the Binutils maintain do not consider it a FreeBSD problem.
So it isn't.  Have you emailed the Binutils list yet??

> the fact is: FreeBSD 4.x has broken binutils

Your fact -- the Binutils experts (ie, the maintainers) tell me it isn't.
I am not going to create a Linux-like rouge Binutils version.  FreeBSD
runs the official Binutils.

> (but it affects only debugging process) and broken g++ (incorrect code
> generation). the second problem is quite serious. solutions exist for both
> problems for quite long time but nothing has been done so far (please
> understand that I am not blaming you). what can help us to solve this?
> more committers who deal with binutils/gcc? money?

More _PEOPLE_ (this includes you) who deal with the Binutils and GCC
developers.  There are hardly any FreeBSD users who contribute to the
development of either of those tools.

 
> another question is how can one get to know official information
> (if such exists), for example, about planned binutils/gcc/gdb changes.

The GCC, Binutils, and GDB mailing lists of course.

-- 
-- David  (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
          Disclaimer: Not speaking for FreeBSD, just expressing my own opinion.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000920005447.B97385>