Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 14:25:37 +0200 From: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <jruigrok@via-net-works.nl> To: Roman Shterenzon <roman@xpert.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: negative bytes/sec? Message-ID: <20000927142537.L10657@lucifer.bart.nl> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0009270234010.1938-100000@alchemy.oven.org>; from roman@xpert.com on Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 02:36:35AM %2B0200 References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0009270234010.1938-100000@alchemy.oven.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-On [20000927 01:40], Roman Shterenzon (roman@xpert.com) wrote:
>i586_bzero() bandwidth = -1704293721 bytes/sec
>bzero() bandwidth = 132802124 bytes/sec
Try this,
it worked for Maxim Sobolev, apparantly the data type is too small to
adequately store the calculation on newer systems:
--- npx.c.orig Sat May 15 01:14:13 1999
+++ npx.c Sat May 15 02:01:51 1999
@@ -696,8 +696,8 @@
if (usec <= 0)
usec = 1;
if (bootverbose)
- printf("%s bandwidth = %ld bytes/sec\n",
- funcname, (long)(BUFSIZE * (int64_t)1000000 / usec));
+ printf("%s bandwidth = %ld Kbytes/sec\n",
+ funcname, (long)(BUFSIZE * (int64_t)1000000 / (1024*usec)));
free(buf, M_TEMP);
return (usec);
}
--
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven Network- and systemadministrator
<jruigrok@via-net-works.nl> VIA Net.Works The Netherlands
BSD: Technical excellence at its best http://www.via-net-works.nl
Grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, courage to
change the things I can, and wisdom to know the difference...
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000927142537.L10657>