Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2000 23:28:12 -0400 From: Bill Fumerola <billf@chimesnet.com> To: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com> Cc: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>, Mark Ovens <marko@FreeBSD.ORG>, Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu>, advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: stolen script? Message-ID: <20001001232812.F38472@jade.chc-chimes.com> In-Reply-To: <55614.970457144@winston.osd.bsdi.com>; from jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com on Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 08:25:44PM -0700 References: <bright@wintelcom.net> <55614.970457144@winston.osd.bsdi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 08:25:44PM -0700, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
> I'm afraid that such "blanket coverage" would not be even remotely
> legal, according to the Bern convention or otherwise. All files must
> bear the appropriate rcopyright text, especially given the fact that
> we mix and match copyrights under /usr/src - /usr/src/gnu is obviously
> not covered by src/COPYRIGHT for example.
So why do we even have src/COPYRIGHT, then? To copyright itself?
--
Bill Fumerola - Network Architect, BOFH / Chimes, Inc.
billf@chimesnet.com / billf@FreeBSD.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001001232812.F38472>