Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 19:34:09 +0100 From: Nik Clayton <nik@freebsd.org> To: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com> Cc: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 Message-ID: <20001026193409.A14486@canyon.nothing-going-on.org> In-Reply-To: <21367.972424567@winston.osd.bsdi.com>; from jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com on Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 02:56:07PM -0700 References: <imp@village.org> <21367.972424567@winston.osd.bsdi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 02:56:07PM -0700, Jordan Hubbard wrote: > [redirected to just -current; I'm not sure what this has to do with -net] > > > I agree. I've been using them for a while on my dog slow Windows CE > > machine. There were some minor issues when they were first committed > > to NetBSD on some platforms (due to a too early use of ps and some > > brokeness in ps on pmax, for example), but these were quickly > > resolved. > > So, who wants to do a proof-of-concept implementation for -current > which integrates with our existing rc.conf mechanism? In order to > obey POLA, we should at least have the separate scripts switch off the > same knobs whenever possible. As far as I'm aware, Neil Blakey-Milner is doing just that (I'm surprised he hasn't said so himself, although I think this week/fortnight's quite hectic for him in the real world). N To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001026193409.A14486>