Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2000 13:51:53 +0800 From: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> To: "Matthew N. Dodd" <winter@jurai.net> Cc: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>, "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@scsiguy.com>, Bill Paul <wpaul@FreeBSD.ORG>, Warner Losh <imp@village.org>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: vx driver patch Message-ID: <200011090552.eA95prW18123@mobile.wemm.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0011081745570.32919-100000@sasami.jurai.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Matthew N. Dodd" wrote: > On Wed, 8 Nov 2000, Terry Lambert wrote: > > Maybe it would be possible to have a separate "VLBus" bus that > > went in before the EISA bus? > > I'm still not clear as to why we need to differentiate them. There really > is no requirement that slot 0 be present (other than it being standard and > all.) > > Can we even tell if which EISA devices are really VL devices in disguise? Do you want to know what is even funnier? One of my onboard ahc *PCI* controllers (7895 based I think) also responds to the EISA probes if I enable EISA. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com; peter@netplex.com.au "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200011090552.eA95prW18123>