Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2000 07:40:15 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: Richard J Kuhns <rjk@grauel.com> Cc: Tony Maher <Tony.Maher@eBioinformatics.com>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: rsh problems Message-ID: <200011091440.eA9EeFG19496@billy-club.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 09 Nov 2000 08:37:50 EST." <14858.43182.684154.605368@moriarity.grauel.com> References: <14858.43182.684154.605368@moriarity.grauel.com> <200011090930.UAA04489@shad.au.int.en-bio.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <14858.43182.684154.605368@moriarity.grauel.com> Richard J Kuhns writes: : I mentioned this about a week ago, but didn't get any response. : /usr/src/libexec/rshd/rshd.c was changed in -current to remove PAM support : (v1.33), but it was never MFCed. /etc/pam.conf, however, was (more or : less). v1.6.2.1 (-stable) changed "sufficient" to "required" for some : reason, and v1.8 (-current only) removed the rshd line entirely. Yes. I've been swamped. I think that I have permission from jkh to go ahead and do the MFC of the code. I have other changes to rsh that I want to commit as well, so I'll do the commit to head first than MFC only the PAM related changed. The PAM module always whined for rsh, that's not new, so the whining doesn't really concern me too much given the PAM code is going away :-) Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200011091440.eA9EeFG19496>