Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2000 11:19:07 +0800 From: Jing-Tang Keith Jang <keith@bsdvm.jtjang.idv.tw> To: ports@freebsd.org Cc: Satoshi Asami <asami@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: zh-tw-netscape-* Message-ID: <20001115111906.A11675@bsdvm.jtjang.idv.tw> In-Reply-To: <200011142228.eAEMSPp22572@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>; from asami@freebsd.org on Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 02:28:25PM -0800 References: <200011142228.eAEMSPp22572@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/14/00, Satoshi Asami wrote: > This port depends on cle_base and linux-netscape, however the latter > depends on linux_base and cle_base complains about conflicting with > linux_base. Yes, but I don't know the correct solution. Since cle_base is itself a fully-functional /compat/linux, if the detection/complaint is removed, it would overwrite the whole linux_base(if installed). The zh-linux-ns package also depends on both cle_base and linux_base, thus fails to install unless -f is specified. The only solution I can think of, is to let cle_base depend on linux_base, and add (maybe hundreds of) "@exec mv bin bin.orig" "@unexec mv bin.orig bin", but it's truly ugly. Maybe these can be put in pkg-install. In fact, chinese/netscape-* should have the problem also, since they depend on both chinese/XFree86-aoutlibs and x11/XFree86-aoutlibs, and the former has the same detection/complaint as cle_base. > Besides, shouldn't these ports be called "zh_TW-netscape-..." to > conform with the package name standard in the handbook? Yes, it's just fixed. Thank you your highness. :-) -- Keep it simple and stupid. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001115111906.A11675>