Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 01:04:15 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Henning Meier-Geinitz <henningmg@gmx.de> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD SANE port Message-ID: <20001204010415.A10484@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20001203005041.A6558@vortex.swb.de>; from henningmg@gmx.de on Sun, Dec 03, 2000 at 12:50:41AM %2B0100 References: <20001203005041.A6558@vortex.swb.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Dec 03, 2000 at 12:50:41AM +0100, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote: > patch-ae (missing DBG_INIT and implementation of sanei_scsi_find_devices): > The DBG_INIT is fixed in 1.0.4. Concerning the rest of the patch: I > would like to add it to SANE for 1.0.5. Is this possible (SANE is > GPL, I don't know the licence of the patches in ports)? By definition the patch to a GPL'ed program is GPL'ed. This `patch-ae' is GPL'ed. The only question is one of ownership. Does the SANE group insist on owning all the code in SANE as the FSF does with GCC, or do you not really care? In general the patches should be assumed to be under the same license as the source they patch. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001204010415.A10484>