Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 05 Dec 2000 13:56:46 +1100
From:      Peter Jeremy <peter.jeremy@alcatel.com.au>
To:        "Chad R. Larson" <chad@DCFinc.com>
Cc:        stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: lint
Message-ID:  <20001205135646.B95349@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <200011232049.NAA17951@freeway.dcfinc.com>; from chad@DCFinc.com on Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 01:49:16PM -0700
References:  <20001123193652.V27042@speedy.gsinet> <200011232049.NAA17951@freeway.dcfinc.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2000-Nov-23 13:49:16 -0700, "Chad R. Larson" <chad@DCFinc.com> wrote:
>But GCC with the right switches can do a better job than Lint anyway

GCC won't report `returned value ignored'.  AFAIK, this is primarily
due to the LISP-like viewpoint of it's authors - they don't see that
ignoring a returned value is in any way abnormal.

Peter


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001205135646.B95349>