Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 21:59:34 +0100 From: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <jruigrok@via-net-works.nl> To: Ben Smithurst <csxbcs@comp.leeds.ac.uk> Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: docs/24410: send(2) man page does not mention EHOSTDOWN Message-ID: <20010117215934.A37326@lucifer.bart.nl> In-Reply-To: <200101172050.f0HKo6U98316@freefall.freebsd.org>; from csxbcs@comp.leeds.ac.uk on Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 12:50:06PM -0800 References: <200101172050.f0HKo6U98316@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-On [20010117 21:55], Ben Smithurst (csxbcs@comp.leeds.ac.uk) wrote: > > Would an explanation like > > [EHOSTDOWN] The remote host was down. > > be sufficient, or would something a bit more detailed be better? The > explanation for EHOSTUNREACH isn't very long though... For now, yes. The fact that ye at least mention it, is an improvement in itself. -- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven VIA Net.Works The Netherlands BSD: Technical excellence at its best Network- and systemadministrator D78D D0AD 244D 1D12 C9CA 7152 035C 1138 546A B867 Killing me is not enough to make me go away... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010117215934.A37326>