Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2001 21:44:04 -0800 From: "Crist J. Clark" <cjclark@reflexnet.net> To: Arcady Genkin <antipode@thpoon.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: stunnel configuration (-l option) Message-ID: <20010121214404.G10761@rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflex> In-Reply-To: <874rys45pu.fsf@tea.thpoon.com>; from antipode@thpoon.com on Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 10:37:49PM -0500 References: <874rys45pu.fsf@tea.thpoon.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 10:37:49PM -0500, Arcady Genkin wrote: > Trying to wrap stunnel around UW imapd server, I'm launching stunnel > with "-l /usr/local/libexec/imapd" option. This works fine, but only > for one connection. If a second client tries to connect, the server > does not respond, and the first connection is hung. > > I changed the -l option to "-r localhost:imap", and it works fine for > multiple connections. But this requires the connections to go through > inetd as well, and I was hoping to get rid of that necessity. Is that > possible? > > I tried "-L" option instead of "-l", but my imap client got upset at > the results. ;^) # stunnel -d 993 -l /usr/local/libexec/imapd -- imapd Doesn't work? Once someone connects, a separate stunnel should fork leaving the listener bound on 993/tcp. -- Crist J. Clark cjclark@alum.mit.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010121214404.G10761>