Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 21 Jan 2001 20:54:58 -0600
From:      David Kelly <dkelly@grumpy.dyndns.org>
To:        bastill@sa.apana.org.au
Cc:        "Julien P." <julien.pham@online.fr>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD vs linux 
Message-ID:  <200101220254.f0M2swl07989@grumpy.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: Message from Brian Astill <bastill@sa.apana.org.au>  of "Mon, 22 Jan 2001 09:56:42 %2B1030." <01012210050400.09119@PhD_1.testname.com.au> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Brian Astill writes:
> Basically, FreeBSD is Unix in everything but name (its a copyright problem that
> prevents the use of the name Unix).

Its a trademark problem, not quite the same thing as copyright.

As for the difference between FreeBSD and Linux, the shortest way I know
how to say it is that I believe FreeBSD is more mature, knows where Unix
has been and where Unix is going. Most all of The Big Mistakes have
already been tried in *BSD and corrected. Many of which Linux has had to
rediscover for itself.

The majority of Linux users are also Windows users and wear
Microsoft-colored glasses no matter how much they badmouth Microsoft.
They continue to build their new land with a Microsoft tint. This may 
not be a bad thing, only time will tell.


--
David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@hiwaay.net
=====================================================================
The human mind ordinarily operates at only ten percent of its
capacity -- the rest is overhead for the operating system.




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200101220254.f0M2swl07989>