Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2001 19:43:10 +0300 (MSK) From: "Aleksandr A.Babaylov" <babolo@links.ru> To: mwade@cdc.net (Mike Wade) Cc: grog@lemis.com, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: if_fxp driver info (which card then?) Message-ID: <200101261643.TAA07260@aaz.links.ru> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0101260844390.34314-100000@net-ninja.com> from "Mike Wade" at "Jan 26, 1 08:51:32 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mike Wade writes: > On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, Greg Lehey wrote: > > Performance isn't even the main thing. As I said earlier, it's plain > > bloody unreliable. Linux people avoid the EtherExpress because they > > think something is wrong with the card. They were surprised when I > > reported that it works without any problems under FreeBSD. Do we > > really want to change that? > Slightly off subject but with all the discussion about not Intel playing > nicely with the FreeBSD developers... I've always had the best > reliability, performance, and lower CPU usage with the Intel EtherExpress > Pro 10/100B cards in FreeBSD (and Solaris x86 for that matter). Are there > better cards out there that I should be looking at? 3C905 -- @BABOLO http://links.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200101261643.TAA07260>