Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 23:13:31 +0000 From: Josef Karthauser <joe@tao.org.uk> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/release/picobsd/dial PICOBSD src/release/pic Message-ID: <20010202231331.D629@tao.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.010202111614.jhb@FreeBSD.org>; from jhb@FreeBSD.org on Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 11:16:14AM -0800 References: <200102020416.f124GD935893@harmony.village.org> <XFMail.010202111614.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 11:16:14AM -0800, John Baldwin wrote: > > Well, then how about src/release/picobsd and move the rest of src/release > into a src/release/freebsd? Right now you have picobsd sitting on the side > of the rest of the release tree at a different level. If you want to argue > that pico is just another release then fine, but let's put the different > release mechanisms at the same logical level in the tree. src/release/Makefile > doesn't recurse into picobsd/ and build picobsd distributions, it just builds > a freebsd distribution, so lets move it to src/release/freebsd. It may not be such a bad thing to have picobsd build with release and make the default builds available as images. It should help to prevent bit rot as well. It's in a dark corner at the moment and things tend to get broken. I believe that I'm probably the only one who half keeps an eye on it under -current. Joe [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjp7PxoACgkQXVIcjOaxUBbrCQCfWdl3thSZMpnS6imiXofHdBO4 d2QAn0/njeAZwLXhPo4ZeLqwT92YqGv4 =3u0h -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010202231331.D629>