Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 11:19:52 +0100 From: Maxime Henrion <mux@qualys.com> To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>, Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com>, Greg Black <gjb@gbch.net> Subject: Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qmail IO problems) Message-ID: <20010207111952.B484@nebula.cybercable.fr> In-Reply-To: <41626.981533532@critter>; from phk@critter.freebsd.dk on Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 09:12:12AM %2B0100 References: <nospam-3a8102a6ad0a69e@maxim.gbch.net> <41626.981533532@critter>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <nospam-3a8102a6ad0a69e@maxim.gbch.net>, Greg Black writes: > >Matt Dillon wrote: > > > >It seems to me that you're saying that softupdates is now the > >recommended way to go -- so why does 4.2-Release still have the > >dire warnings in /sys/ufs/ffs/README.softupdates? Is that file > >obsolete, or do the warnings still apply? > > I think that file is obsolete by now. > > I also think we should make newfs turn softupdates on by default in > -current. What do you think of what NetBSD implemented ? softupdates is now enabled via a mount option. This seems cleaner than the tunefs -n enable thing. Maxime -- Don't be fooled by cheap finnish imitations ; BSD is the One True Code Key fingerprint = F9B6 1D5A 4963 331C 88FC CA6A AB50 1EF2 8CBE 99D6 Public Key : http://www.epita.fr/~henrio_m/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010207111952.B484>