Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 15:13:00 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> To: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> Cc: Leif Neland <leif@neland.dk>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: *_ROOT removed Message-ID: <20010207151300.S26076@fw.wintelcom.net> In-Reply-To: <200102071428.f17ESgt64468@mobile.wemm.org>; from peter@netplex.com.au on Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 06:28:42AM -0800 References: <033801c0910d$093451c0$0e00a8c0@neland.dk> <200102071428.f17ESgt64468@mobile.wemm.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> [010207 06:29] wrote: > "Leif Neland" wrote: > > While the error-messages are clear, I don't remember seeing any heads-up, or > mentioning of this in UPDATING > > > > Or is it just me...? > > No, there wasn't one.. The commit message was pretty clear - You are > reading them, right? We usually do HEAD UP's for stuff that will break > people pretty badly or get them in trouble (eg: an unviable kernel if the > instructions are not followed). > > At least you got the message. buildkernel would have silently ignored this > up until recently. Does this mean that 'FFS' isn't optional anymore? I mean it probably hasn't been (or never was) but the intention was that to build 4.4BSD you needed _either_ UFS or INET, but you could ditch either one and still build a kernel. -Alfred To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010207151300.S26076>