Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 15:01:41 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: seebs@plethora.net (Peter Seebach) Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Setting memory allocators for library functions. Message-ID: <200102252201.f1PM1fY00967@billy-club.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 25 Feb 2001 09:59:02 CST." <200102251559.f1PFx2627103@guild.plethora.net> References: <200102251559.f1PFx2627103@guild.plethora.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <200102251559.f1PFx2627103@guild.plethora.net> Peter Seebach writes: : In message <3A98EE37.7B0B6CE0@newsguy.com>, "Daniel C. Sobral" writes: : >OTOH, the *only* way to get non-overcommit to FreeBSD is for someone who : >*wants* that feature to sit down and code it. It won't happen otherwise. : : So, out of idle curiousity: If, somewhere down the road, I know the kernel : well enough to attempt such a thing, what would the interest level be in : merging such a feature? Assuming that it doesn't break anything, that it doesn't introduce a severe performance penalty and works, there would be interest. There are times that this is a desirable feature. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200102252201.f1PM1fY00967>