Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2001 04:42:50 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <TrimYourCc@NUXI.com> To: Alex Zepeda <jazepeda@pacbell.net> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: if_fxp - the real point Message-ID: <20010309044249.A28945@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20010308181307.A3568@zippy.mybox.zip>; from jazepeda@pacbell.net on Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 06:13:07PM -0800 References: <"Your <5.0.0.25.0.20010308120015.01ee2eb0"@mail.etinc.com> <200103081720.f28HK1201269@guild.plethora.net> <5.0.0.25.0.20010308144541.0281a980@mail.etinc.com> <20010308181307.A3568@zippy.mybox.zip>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 06:13:07PM -0800, Alex Zepeda wrote:
> However, there *ARE* some of us who aren't intimate with your fxp
> problems.
The problem does exist. I have a board that the `fxp' driver splits this
out for:
fxp0: warning: unsupported PHY, type = 17, addr = 2
fxp1: warning: unsupported PHY, type = 17, addr = 2
> You've got a valid problem. Go away.
"You've got a valid problem, go away." huh??
His points are very valid about maintenance of the `fxp' driver.
His views on how to make something happen are what is a little out of
touch.
--
-- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
GNU is Not Unix / Linux Is Not UniX
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010309044249.A28945>