Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 20 Mar 2001 08:55:04 -0800
From:      "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org>
To:        Dima Dorfman <dima@unixfreak.org>
Cc:        doc@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: OpenJade support isn't complete
Message-ID:  <20010320085504.A28070@dragon.nuxi.com>
In-Reply-To: <20010320060955.78DEC3E09@bazooka.unixfreak.org>; from dima@unixfreak.org on Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 10:09:55PM -0800
References:  <20010319210147.A74643@dragon.nuxi.com> <20010320060955.78DEC3E09@bazooka.unixfreak.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 10:09:55PM -0800, Dima Dorfman wrote:
> This is a ports bug; a pasto, I think.  With the patch below, I was
> able to remove /usr/ports/textproc/jade, install the docproj port,

Did you wind up with a new installation of textproc/jade?
I do not see how you could, as the patch you included is only less bogus
than the original test.

You did not remove the RUN_DEPENDS on nsgmls:${PORTSDIR}/textproc/jade.
Here is the Makefile after applying your patch:

    .if ${OSVERSION} < 220000
    RUN_DEPENDS=	nsgmls:${PORTSDIR}/textproc/sp
    .else
    RUN_DEPENDS=	nsgmls:${PORTSDIR}/textproc/jade
    .endif

    .if ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "alpha"
    WITH_OPENJADE=	yes
    .endif

    .if defined(WITH_OPENJADE)
    RUN_DEPENDS=	onsgmls:${PORTSDIR}/textproc/openjade
    .endif

Note that all FreeBSD/Alpha machines have OSVERSION > 220000.  Thus
nsgmls:${PORTSDIR}/textproc/jade before we even check to see if we are an
Alpha.  I believe the patch I posted to be correct over this one.

-- 
-- David  (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
          GNU is Not Unix / Linux Is Not UniX

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010320085504.A28070>