Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 23 Mar 2001 17:53:51 +0100
From:      alex@cichlids.cichlids.com (Alexander Langer)
To:        Mikhail Teterin <mi@misha.privatelabs.com>
Cc:        ports@freebsd.org, billf@freebsd.org, knu@freebsd.org, ve@sci.fi
Subject:   Re: WITH_X11 vs. NO_X
Message-ID:  <20010323175351.A2279@cichlids.cichlids.com>
In-Reply-To: <200103212041.f2LKfB161374@misha.privatelabs.com>; from mi@misha.privatelabs.com on Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 03:41:10PM -0500
References:  <200103212041.f2LKfB161374@misha.privatelabs.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thus spake Mikhail Teterin (mi@misha.privatelabs.com):

> 	.ifndef NO_X
> 	WITH_X11=	YES
> 	.endif
> or the other way around?

No.
NO_X forbids use of X while WITH_X11 enables it explicitely.
There still is a "I just don't care" case.

Alex

-- 
cat: /home/alex/.sig: No such file or directory

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010323175351.A2279>