Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 12:15:40 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Benny Prijono <seventhson@theseventhson.freeserve.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: gcc 2.95.3 and STL Message-ID: <20010328121539.A83100@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <3AC1B2C1.8BE22BD1@theseventhson.freeserve.co.uk>; from seventhson@theseventhson.freeserve.co.uk on Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 10:45:37AM %2B0100 References: <3AC1A050.62BE0194@pop3.NL.net> <20010328010123.A40915@dragon.nuxi.com> <3AC1B2C1.8BE22BD1@theseventhson.freeserve.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 10:45:37AM +0100, Benny Prijono wrote: > the March 2001 edition of C++ Users Journal (http://www.cuj.com) has > surveys on comformance level of each C++ compiler and STL > implementation. You may want to take a look at it. I didn't see the article on-line, so I'll have to try my local Borders. But the point is actually mute. The STLport will not build on FreeBSD using either bmake or gmake. If someone wants to put some time into getting around the problems, then people would have a choice again. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010328121539.A83100>