Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 13:40:44 +0100 From: Ben Smithurst <ben@FreeBSD.org> To: "Brian D. Woodruff" <wood@soundconcept.net> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Further question Re: cvsupped to RELENG_4 but got 4.3-RC Message-ID: <20010405134044.A72405@scientia.demon.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.0.20010404234810.020e2ba0@pop3.norton.antivirus> References: <4.3.2.7.0.20010404211832.020c6b60@pop3.norton.antivirus> <4.3.2.7.0.20010404211832.020c6b60@pop3.norton.antivirus> <20010404223544.A13450@peitho.fxp.org> <4.3.2.7.0.20010404234810.020e2ba0@pop3.norton.antivirus>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Brian D. Woodruff wrote: > At 10:35 PM 4/4/01 -0400, you wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 09:32:39PM -0500, Brian D. Woodruff wrote: >>> Here are my questions: >>> >>> 1.) is there a way to specify 4.2-STABLE, which is what I have been using? > > excellent answer to part 2 > > can anyone tell me how to get the STABLE version I want? Did you read the first sentence of that FAQ entry? "Short answer: it's just a name." If you cvsup the RELENG_4 branch, you're getting FreeBSD-stable, whether it be called -STABLE, -RC, -BETA, -FISHCAKE, -UNSTABLE-AS-HELL, or even -CURRENT if someone felt like playing an April Fool's day joke in /sys/conf/newvers.sh. :-) > I would rather be consistent across my servers than have some be one > release past the others. Well if it said 4.2-STABLE and you builtworld on one and not the others you still wouldn't be consistent, they'd still be different codebases but with the same name. If it _really_ bothers you just change /sys/conf/newvers.sh appropriately so your kernel reports itself as 4.2-STABLE, if all you want is the same name but different codebases. -- Ben Smithurst / ben@FreeBSD.org / PGP: 0x99392F7D To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010405134044.A72405>