Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2001 01:04:12 -0700 From: Dima Dorfman <dima@unixfreak.org> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: Brian Somers <brian@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/bin/ps ps.c Message-ID: <20010407080412.E21673E09@bazooka.unixfreak.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0104071748060.62574-100000@besplex.bde.org>; from bde@zeta.org.au on "Sat, 7 Apr 2001 17:57:36 %2B1000 (EST)"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> writes: > On Fri, 6 Apr 2001, Brian Somers wrote: > > Log: > > The sess column went away last December with v1.26 of keyword.c > > Remove it from ``jfmt''. > > > > Forgotten by: mckusick > > This stomps on PR 26057, which contains more complete fixes. It's > not clear whether the bug is the non-removal of the sess column and > the sess keyword or the removal of the e_sess pointer. This particular commit doesn't really hurt anything. We just need to decide whether there should be an e_sess (or ki_sess, now) pointer or not. PR 26057, which you mention, contains a patch to add it back. Although mckusick did explicitly say he was removing it in his kproc_info commit, he didn't provide rationale. So, the question is: do we want a `sess' column? Regards, Dima Dorfman dima@unixfreak.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010407080412.E21673E09>