Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 10 May 2001 13:34:25 +0930
From:      Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>
To:        Scott Mace <smace@intt.org>
Cc:        Dan Phoenix <dphoenix@bravenet.com>, FreeBSD Questions <questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: vinum on 2 ide drives?
Message-ID:  <20010510133425.K56501@wantadilla.lemis.com>
In-Reply-To: <BFENLHFJOCHGGGAHGHOPKEADCCAA.smace@intt.org>; from smace@intt.org on Wed, May 09, 2001 at 10:46:43PM -0500
References:  <20010510125406.I56501@wantadilla.lemis.com> <BFENLHFJOCHGGGAHGHOPKEADCCAA.smace@intt.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday,  9 May 2001 at 22:46:43 -0500, Scott Mace wrote:
> I'm seeing the same behaviour with a pair of IBM drives.  I even made sure
> that
> write cache was enabled...  I'm using 307030's
>
> This is on a regular non-vinum partition
>
> onix2# iozone 128 8192
>
>         IOZONE: Performance Test of Sequential File I/O  --  V2.01 (10/21/94)
>
>         IOZONE writes a 128 Megabyte sequential file consisting of
>         16384 records which are each 8192 bytes in length.
>         It then reads the file.  It prints the bytes-per-second
>         rate at which the computer can read and write files.

This is not really relevant to real-life access.  But it might explain
Dan's issues: sequential access to a stripe will be slower than to a
concat plex such as you're using.

> IOZONE performance measurements:
>         21746669 bytes/second for writing the file
>         29671622 bytes/second for reading the file
>
> This is on a vinum mirror.
>
> IOZONE performance measurements:
>         10784600 bytes/second for writing the file
>         24437936 bytes/second for reading the file

It's difficult to guess what's going on here.  Looking at your
configuration below, I'd guess that you're not comparing things
directly.

> drive vinumdrive0 device /dev/ad0s1e
> drive vinumdrive2 device /dev/ad0s1f
> drive vinumdrive4 device /dev/ad0s1g
> drive vinumdrive1 device /dev/ad1s1e
> drive vinumdrive3 device /dev/ad1s1f
> drive vinumdrive5 device /dev/ad1s1g

These are four drives too many.  You don't want more than one drive
per spindle.

Greg
--
Finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key
See complete headers for address and phone numbers

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010510133425.K56501>