Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 18:57:00 +0300 From: Peter Pentchev <roam@orbitel.bg> To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Cc: Jim Pirzyk <Jim.Pirzyk@disney.com>, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bin/27240: df does not support '-l' option Message-ID: <20010511185700.D24224@ringworld.oblivion.bg> In-Reply-To: <200105111548.LAA93845@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>; from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu on Fri, May 11, 2001 at 11:48:12AM -0400 References: <200105111530.f4BFU3l07328@freefall.freebsd.org> <20010511184636.B24224@ringworld.oblivion.bg> <200105111548.LAA93845@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 11:48:12AM -0400, Garrett Wollman wrote: > <<On Fri, 11 May 2001 18:46:37 +0300, Peter Pentchev <roam@orbitel.bg> said: > > > I still think the MNT_LOCAL way is cleaner - no mucking up with kernel > > internal defines > > I'm not aware of any ``kernel internal defines'' involved here. OK, let me put it another way - I think adding dependence on sysctl's and VFCF_* flags is gratuitous, when df(1) already uses the statfs(2) interface (albeit indirectly, via getmntinfo(3)), and the MNT_LOCAL flag is really all we need here. G'luck, Peter -- This sentence was in the past tense. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010511185700.D24224>