Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 20:18:56 -0400 (EDT) From: mi@aldan.algebra.com To: ghost@aladdin.com Cc: ports@freebsd.org, andreas@freebsd.org, raph@artofcode.com Subject: Re: GhostScript and JPEG Message-ID: <200105150018.f4F0Ivq14289@misha.privatelabs.com> In-Reply-To: <200105142348.QAA00167@aladdin.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 14 May, L. Peter Deutsch wrote: > Sure, I think that would be a fine idea. The only arrays that are > dimensioned as [D_MAX_BLOCKS_IN_MCU] are some temporary arrays of > booleans and pointers allocated on the C stack within libjpeg, and an > array of ints in the decompression state structure. So increasing this > value from 10 to 64 increases the size of the decompression state > structure by (64-10)*4 = 216 bytes. Not enough to worry about. Khmm, was this ever suggested to the libjpeg maintainers? -mi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200105150018.f4F0Ivq14289>