Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 16:07:08 +0200 From: Neil Blakey-Milner <nbm@mithrandr.moria.org> To: Brian Somers <brian@Awfulhak.org> Cc: Ying-Chieh Liao <ijliao@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/socks5 Makefile pkg-plist Message-ID: <20010517160707.A5538@rapier.smartspace.co.za> In-Reply-To: <200105170926.f4H9Qab60547@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org>; from brian@Awfulhak.org on Thu, May 17, 2001 at 10:26:36AM %2B0100 References: <ijliao@FreeBSD.org> <200105170926.f4H9Qab60547@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu 2001-05-17 (10:26), Brian Somers wrote: > Is a PORTREVISION bump necessary for doc/example fixes ? > > To me, a PORTVERSION change means I need to rebuild & reinstall the Strictly, it should occur whenever the generated package is different in any way. Theoretically we should also bump it if something like a static archive that it relies upon gets changed, and things like that. If done properly, it can help maintain as high a standard as Debian usually enjoys in binary package dependencies and upgrades. Neil -- Neil Blakey-Milner nbm@mithrandr.moria.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010517160707.A5538>