Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 02:06:44 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@inethouston.net> Cc: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com>, sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs@FreeBSD.ORG, ade@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: samba-2.2.0_1 Message-ID: <20010518020644.A71658@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <019c01c0db36$f962e9e0$931576d8@inethouston.net>; from dwcjr@inethouston.net on Sat, May 12, 2001 at 05:57:52PM -0500 References: <XFMail.010512154807.jdp@polstra.com> <019c01c0db36$f962e9e0$931576d8@inethouston.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 05:57:52PM -0500, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote:
> Because some people are still weary of 2.2.0 due to the massive changes in
> it while 2.0.9 has been around a while. It doesn't matter to me how it
> happens, but we should atleast keep around 2.0.9 for a while and 2.2.0 isn't
> alpha anymore so it should not be samba-devel
`samba' should be the lastest release, period. That means 2.2.0.
For those afraid of it, repo copy the exiting 2.0.9 to samba20, with a
plan to cvs rm it in 3 mo.
All this numbered ports crap just confuses the hell out of users.
--
-- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Disclaimer: Not speaking for FreeBSD, just expressing my own opinion.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010518020644.A71658>