Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 18:30:56 +0300 (EEST) From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG> To: ade@FreeBSD.ORG (Ade Lovett) Cc: sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG (Maxim Sobolev), gnome@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Divorcing gdk-pixbuf and gnome-canvas Message-ID: <200105181531.f4IFVQb01132@vega.vega.com> In-Reply-To: <20010518101758.I7295@FreeBSD.org> from "Ade Lovett" at May 18, 2001 10:17:58 AM
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>
> On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 06:09:34PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> > Therefore we could split gdk-pixbuf into two ports -
> > gtk-pixbuf and gnome-canvas.
> >
> > Attached please find patches that do the trick. I would like
> > to hear what do gnomers think about my proposal.
>
> I'm not amazingly happy about this. Remember, if nautilus ever
> works, I'd expect the primary consumer of mozilla to be the x11/gnome
> metaport, where everything is already in place anyway.
Yes, but we should not force user to install Gnome just because
he wants to run Mozilla. Mozilla should be available in the
Gnome-free environment (KDE for example) as well.
> I also don't see patches for mail/stuphead and sysutils/gnomecontrolcenter
> which currently depend on gdk_pixbuf.2 directly and would want to see
> at least a full successful build of x11/gnome before doing this.
I supposed that it is obvious: just replace all
gdk_pixbuf.1:${PORTSDIR}/graphics/gdk-pixbuf lines in LIB_DEPENDS
with gnomecanvaspixbuf.1:${PORTSDIR}/graphics/gnomecanvas. This
will provide 1:1 mapping between old and new layout. After that,
ports that only need gdk-pixbuf but not gnomecanvas have to be
identified and ajusted accordingly.
-Maxim
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200105181531.f4IFVQb01132>