Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 22:08:44 -0500 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com> To: James Howard <howardjp@well.com> Cc: Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com>, Alfred Perlstein <bright@rush.net>, Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ab.ca>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: telnet to AF_UNIX sockets [PATCH] Message-ID: <20010523220844.A26487@shade.nectar.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0105232009590.27087-100000@y.glue.umd.edu>; from howardjp@well.com on Wed, May 23, 2001 at 08:10:20PM -0400 References: <200105232304.f4NN44h17482@earth.backplane.com> <Pine.GSO.4.21.0105232009590.27087-100000@y.glue.umd.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 08:10:20PM -0400, James Howard wrote: > I am missing something here. Is there a practical use for this? :) You are not the only one. I can appreciate the `neat' factor, but I cringed at the commit. It seems like functionality that would be better put in a separate utility (or port even). It's not like you'd ever want to run the NVT protocol over an AF_UNIX socket. -- Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.com / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010523220844.A26487>